Red-zone command

Scoring range intelligence

Verified 2025 play-by-play shows who earns the work, how close it occurs to the goal line, and whether conversion is backed by volume.

Methodology

Penalty-nullified plays are excluded. Inside-20, inside-10, and inside-5 are nested. All-position usage views exclude QBs because they participate in nearly every offensive snap.

Matchups

Player scoring model

From workload to scoring equity

Filter the player pool, then follow workload toward the goal line.

80 players

Qualified opportunity pool · player pool15,794

100%

Inside 20 · of opportunity pool2,662

16.9%

Inside 10 · of inside-201,285

48.3%

Inside 5 · of inside-10704

54.8%

Red-zone touchdowns · of inside-20471

17.7%

What survives the funnel

17.7%

Touchdowns per red-zone opportunity in this filtered player pool.

Players80

Inside-5 share26.4%

SplitFull Season

Top filtered players

1Christian McCaffrey107 2Kyren Williams75 3Jonathan Taylor72

Team conversion

Volume separates signal from a hot rate

Compare opportunity volume and conversion together, or switch to rate bars.

2025 regular season · converted trips / red-zone trips

Top-right = frequent trips and strong conversion. Bubble size = total converted trips.

Keyboard-friendly team red-zone data

Name	Trips / game	Conversion	Converted trips
LAR	4.5	63.2%	48/76
JAX	4.0	61.8%	42/68
IND	3.9	65.2%	43/66
SF	3.9	65.2%	43/66
BUF	3.8	66.2%	43/65
DAL	3.8	56.9%	37/65
DET	3.8	62.5%	40/64
NE	3.7	57.1%	36/63
ARI	3.6	54.1%	33/61
KC	3.5	57.6%	34/59
GB	3.5	57.6%	34/59
SEA	3.5	54.2%	32/59
NYG	3.5	47.5%	28/59
BAL	3.5	47.5%	28/59
DEN	3.4	57.9%	33/57
LAC	3.4	47.4%	27/57
CHI	3.2	58.2%	32/55
CIN	3.2	66.7%	36/54
HOU	3.2	46.3%	25/54
PIT	3.0	58.8%	30/51
MIN	3.0	56.9%	29/51
ATL	2.9	62.0%	31/50
TB	2.9	54.0%	27/50
MIA	2.8	56.3%	27/48
WSH	2.7	65.2%	30/46
CAR	2.6	53.3%	24/45
NO	2.6	44.4%	20/45
PHI	2.6	70.5%	31/44
CLE	2.2	52.6%	20/38
NYJ	2.2	44.7%	17/38
LV	2.1	50.0%	18/36
TEN	1.9	57.6%	19/33